We discuss the development and evaluation of quantum interactive learning tutorials (QuILTs), which are suitable for
undergraduate courses in quantum mechanics. QuILTs are based on the investigation of student difficulties in learning quantum physics. They exploit computer-based visualization tools and help students build links between the formal and conceptual aspects of quantum physics without compromising the technical content. They can be used both as supplements to lectures or as self-study tools.
The author is very grateful to Mario Belloni and Wolfgang Christian for their help in developing and adapting their open source physics simulations for QuILTs. The author also thanks Albert Huber for the Mach–Zehnder interferometer simulation and to Klaus Muthsam for the double slit simulation. The author thanks all the faculty who have administered different versions of QuILTs in their classrooms. We thank Y. Beck for help in developing some of the tutorials. This work is supported in part by the National Science Foundation awards NSF-PHY-055434 and NSF-PHY-0653129.
- 1. D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1995), preface. Google Scholar
- 2. E. J. Galvez, C. H. Holbrow, M. J. Pysher, J. W. Martin, N. Courtemanche, L. Heilig, and J. Spencer, “Interference with correlated photons: Five quantum mechanics experiments for undergraduates,” Am. J. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1796811 73, 127–140 (2005). Google Scholar,
- 3. P. Jolly, D. Zollman, S. Rebello, and A. Dimitrova, “Visualizing potential energy diagrams,” Am. J. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18808 66(1), 57–63 (1998). Google Scholar,
- 4. D. Styer, “Common misconceptions regarding quantum mechanics,” Am. J. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18288 64, 31–34 (1996). Google Scholar,
- 5. “Research on teaching and learning of quantum mechanics,” Papers presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, ⟨perg.phys.ksu.edu/papers/narst⟩ (1999). Google Scholar
- 6. See for example, the theme issue of Am. J. Phys. 70(3) (2002) published in conjunction with the Gordon conference on teaching and research in quantum mechanics. Google Scholar
- 7. C. Singh, “Student understanding of quantum mechanics,” Am. J. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1365404 69(8), 885–896 (2001). Google Scholar,
- 8. C. Singh, M. Belloni, and W. Christian, “Improving student’s understanding of quantum mechanics,” Phys. Today https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2349732 59(8), 43–49 (2006). Google Scholar
- 9. C. Singh, “Transfer of learning in quantum mechanics,” AIP Conf. Proc. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2084692 790, 23–26 (2005). Google Scholar
- 10. C. Singh, “Improving student understanding of quantum mechanics,” AIP Conf. Proc. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2177025 818, 69–72 (2006). Google Scholar
- 11. C. Singh, “Student difficulties with quantum mechanics formalism,” AIP Conf. Proc. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2508723 883, 185–188 (2007). Google Scholar
- 12. C. Singh, “Helping students learn quantum mechanics for quantum computing,” AIP Conf. Proc. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2508687 883, 42–45 (2007). Google Scholar
- 13. H. Fischler and M. Lichtfeldt, “Modern physics and students’ conceptions,” Int. J. Sci. Educ. 14(2), 181–190 (1992). Google Scholar
- 14. See for example, ⟨www.opensourcephysics.org⟩ and M. Belloni, W. Christian, and A. Cox, Physlet Quantum Physics (Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2006). Google Scholar
- 15. M. Belloni and W. Christian, “Physlets for quantum mechanics,” Comput. Sci. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCISE.2003.1166558 5, 90–96 (2003); Google Scholar
M. Belloni, W. Christian, and A. Cox, Physlet Quantum Physics (Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2006). , Google Scholar
- 16. The Mach–Zehnder simulation was adapted from ⟨www.physik.uni-muenchen.de/didaktik/Computer/interfer/interfere.html⟩. The double-slit simulation was developed by Klaus Muthsam. Google Scholar
- 17. The original Spins program was written by Daniel Schroeder and Thomas Moore for the Macintosh and was ported to Java by David McIntyre of Oregon State University and used as part of the Paradigms project. Both of these versions are open source. See ⟨www.physics.oregonstate.edu/~mcintyre/ph425/spins/⟩. Google Scholar
- 18. For example, see ⟨www.nhn.ou.edu/reuhome/vizqm/⟩. Google Scholar
- 19. For example, see ⟨en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_ cycle⟩. Google Scholar
- 20. J. Hiller, I. Johnston, and D. Styer, Quantum Mechanics Simulations (Wiley, New York, 1995). Google Scholar
- 21. L. McDermott and P. Shaffer, and the Physics Education Group, University of Washington, Tutorials in Introductory Physics (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002). Google Scholar
- 22. Modern physics tutorials are available at ⟨www.physics.umd.edu/perg/qm/qmcourse/NewModel⟩. Google Scholar
- 23. M. T. H. Chi, “Thinking Aloud,” in The Think Aloud Method, edited by M. W. van Someren, Y. F. Barnard, and J. A. C. Sandberg (Academic Press, London, 1994), Chap. 1. Google Scholar
- 24. The complete tutorial is available at ⟨www.opensourcephysics.org/publications/occam/quilt.html⟩. Google Scholar
- © 2008 American Association of Physics Teachers.
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.